Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $120.0 vs $897.22
- Up to 87% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.44 vs $3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - 274 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
270
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
13%
Price, $
$897.22
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |