Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 194 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $139.99 vs $849.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10920X - $0.79 vs $4.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-10320 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
98.34254143646409%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.69/FPS
16.844349680170577%
Price, $
$849
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
91.88059701492537%
Multi-Core
4626
40.761300555114985%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |