Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $139.99 vs $799.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-13400F - $1.3 vs $5.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 40% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-10320 - 151 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
108
71.52317880794702%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.3/FPS
24.528301886792455%
Price, $
$799.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
67.20524017467248%
Multi-Core
4626
43.05258259655654%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |