Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 228 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $120.0 vs $1150.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.53 vs $5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 48 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
