Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $120.0 vs $1300.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.64 vs $6.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-10320 - 194 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 48 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
187
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.7/FPS
9%
Price, $
$1300
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |