Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 50% better in Rust than FX-8320 - 231 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $74.82 vs $111.99
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74037 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |