Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - 146 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $89.08 vs $111.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73828 minutes ago
Buy for $89.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
53.99361022364217%
Multi-Core
3566
40.02244668911336%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |