Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 34% better in New World than Core i7-3770 - 135 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $122.03 vs $899.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing New World than Core i5-12400F - $1.21 vs $6.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.67/FPS
18%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17890 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
101
74%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |