Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670S - 204 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $55.26 vs $179.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.3 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
34%
Price, $
$179.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
182
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |