Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 45% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 222 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $37.0 vs $184.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11500 - $0.24 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18845 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |