Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1412 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 14% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7551P - 249 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 64 vs 12 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
