Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 196 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
