Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8120 - 187 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $39.99 vs $108.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11400F - $0.26 vs $0.58 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |