Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4460 - 140 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $64.04 vs $115.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11400F - $0.51 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
61%
Price, $
$115.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
126
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |