Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 163 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $74.04 vs $115.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400F - $0.5 vs $0.71 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
70%
Price, $
$115.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |