Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Celeron G4900 - 283 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $68.02 vs $136.5
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11400 - $0.26 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |