Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 20% better in Ready or Not than FX-8300 - 281 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $112.02 vs $136.5
- Up to 2% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400 - $0.48 vs $0.49 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |