Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11300H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11300H is 1229 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11300H
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11300H - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11300H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris XE 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |