Key Differences
In short — Core i5-1038NG7 outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-1038NG7 is 341 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1038NG7
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E-2276M - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 28 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-1038NG7 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-1038NG7
Mobile • May 4th, 2020
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
May 4th, 2020 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 45 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Iris Plus | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
