Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 596 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 45 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 5% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-10300H - 166 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 56 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 28 |
| 8 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
