Buy on Amazon
$199.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 231 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 206 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 62 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - $179.0 vs $199.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-8300 - $0.87 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-8300 3.7GHz 8MB Coffee Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
