Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1865 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $22.92 vs $110.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-8100 - $0.14 vs $0.62 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17860 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |