Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - 104 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $39.9 vs $110.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8100 - $0.43 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6104 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |