Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 240 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 224 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $109.99 vs $129.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-7300 - $0.49 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
223
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |