Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $98.55 vs $105.99
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Core i3-7300 - 220 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $98.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Buy for $105.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1260
64.25293217746048%
Multi-Core
2502
32.88643533123029%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |