Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 877 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 12% better in League of Legends than Core i3-550 - 56 vs 50 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |