Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2356 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 45% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $45.0 vs $81.79
- Up to 38% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.51 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 12% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-530 - 100 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 12 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
62%
Price, $
$81.79
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |