Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4130 is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-530 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-530 - $22.92 vs $45.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-530 - $0.2 vs $0.39 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2060 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$22.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2060 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |