Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 636 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than FX-8320 - 261 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
234
89.65517241379311%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |