Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 18% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-4360 - 103 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $85.13 vs $149.88
- Up to 52% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-4360 - $0.83 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11716 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11714 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |