Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $85.13 vs $121.98
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-12100 - $0.52 vs $0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105F - 176 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10693 minutes ago
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |