Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 60% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6900K - 75 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6900K - $1.63 vs $2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $120.0 vs $121.98
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$121.98
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |