Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 879 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $85.13 vs $145.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9600K - $0.7 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13036 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |