Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1062 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 108 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $85.13 vs $185.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.79 vs $1.81 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17706 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |