Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 33% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-4360 - 60 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $136.49 vs $149.88
- Up to 32% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-4360 - $2.27 vs $3.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
45
75%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
68.16816816816817%
Price, $
$149.88
91%
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $136.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1170
70.56694813027744%
Multi-Core
2318
33.898800818952914%
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |