Buy on Amazon
$149.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4360 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4360 is 1433 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G4900 - 203 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $68.02 vs $149.88
- Up to 53% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-4360 - $0.35 vs $0.74 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-4360 Processor (4M Cache, 3.70 GHz) BX80646I34360
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
192
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4360
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
