Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - 147 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-8350 - $68.02 vs $185.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - $0.46 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
