Buy on Amazon
$41.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $41.13 vs $120.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Stray than Core i3-10320 - $0.23 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i3-4130 - 185 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
181
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2582 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
