Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4005U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1855 days newer than Core i3-4005U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4005U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4005U - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4005U - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4005U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |