Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1457 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4000M - 248 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |