Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2430 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 37 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4000M - 175 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |