Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4130 is 596 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 29% better in League of Legends than Core i3-390M - 53 vs 41 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$22.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |