Key Differences
In short — Celeron G550 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G550 is 509 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i3-390M - 151 vs 150 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |