Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 2553 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-350M - 179 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |