Key Differences
In short — Core i7-920 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 416 days older than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-350M - 116 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |