Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2728 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i3-3217U - 220 vs 210 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
