Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4785T outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4785T is 366 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i7-4785T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3217U - 503 vs 425 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i7-4785T |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
