Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3217U - 117 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 20 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
