Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2553 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3110M - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |