Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $169.99 vs $435.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-2120 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75489 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75488 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
501
18.35164835164835%
Multi-Core
1035
6.010802021023289%
Intel Core i3-2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |